Friday, October 5, 2012

WHEN SUARAM SCORPENE LIARS AND ANWAR IBRAHIM MEET



It with great pleasure that I present to good readers the above video starring 2 close associates, former officers of SUARAM and PKR MPs, Tian Chua and Sivarasa.

The subject of the video, in a press conference by command of their master, Anwar Ibrahim, is the announcement of the PKR de facto leader's invitation to lawyers involved in the Scorpene investigations for a briefing to be held in parliament no less.

It clearly shows an act of desperation on the part of the Pakatan Rakyat designated "prime minister" which only confirms that he and SUARAM are absolutely clueless as to what the actual circumstances of the on-going investigations are, that it requires a briefing from the lawyers concerned.

And much more.

It would be very interesting what the French lawyers can or will say as French laws dictate that "Except where the law provides otherwise and subject to the defendant's rights, the enquiry and investigation proceedings are secret." and "Any person contributing to such proceedings is subjected to professional secrecy under the conditions and subject to the penalties set out by articles 226-13 and 226-14 of the Criminal Code".

Especially, what SUARAM's lawyers have to say about the flagrant manner by which the allegations are freely and unsparingly being publicised by SUARAM and others in concert that infringe a fundamental decree that "Every person suspected or prosecuted is presumed innocent as long as his guilt has not been established. Attacks on his presumption of innocence are proscribed, compensated and punished in the circumstances laid down by statute."

(See French Code Of Criminal Procedure link below, Preliminary Article III and Article 11)

SUARAM has denied political motives or connection in their unholy quest. In a report carried by The Mole this is what Cynthia Gabriel reportedly said, "Nobody has asked us to pursue this issue but we do it on our own accord. It has nothing to do with any influence from political parties."

BERSIH had immediately disassociated itself, “We have nothing to do with that. It is entirely organised by a political party,” said Bersih 2.0 co-chairman S Ambiga when the Pakatan Rakyat announced it's plan for a free and fair election rally.

That SUARAM has not officialy made a similar declaration to disassociate and distance themselves from an obvious politically motivated act of a desperate man and political leader of their comrades, Tian Chua and Sivarasa, is sufficient proof of SUARAM's lies, deceit and political complicity.

I would like to bring to readers attention what that person, with the gift of unsubstantiated gab, Cynthia Gabriel, proudly said when Malaysiakini reported "Suaram: Subpoena finally served on Scorpene witness" - "The inquiry is progressing and we've been allowed to tell you that the first subpoena has reached the first witness. But I can't tell you who the witness is or when the subpoena was given for now, we have to follow the court proceedings and can only quote the court notes."

Malaysiakini also noted in the same report, Cynthia confirmed that the subpoena was served on one of the seven witnesses which it had proposed to the French courts probing the Scorpene deal and that the other six proposed witnesses were Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak (right), Defence Minister Zahid Hamidi, private investigator P Balasubramaniam, Najib's confidante Abdul Razak Baginda and the latter's spouse and father - Mazlinda Makhzan and Abdul Malim Baginda.

For reader's information this is as stated in the French Code Of Criminal Procedure Section IV: THE HEARING OF WITNESSES, Article 105 - Persons against whom there is serious and corroborative evidence that they took part in the offences referred to the investigating judge may not be heard as witnesses.

What it undoubtedly means is that who so ever is called to be a witness, has NO serious and corroborative evidence that they took part in the offences referred to the investigations.

IMPORTANT NOTE:

The Scorpene allegation is in an inquiry stage where judges oversee investigations and is not an actual trial. See SUARAM's announcement and a decidedly political exhortation "a defining turn of events in our already heightened political landscape, and one that will surely give shape in the battle for change"

No comments: